
Core i3-8300

Core i5-7500
Core i3-8300 vs Core i5-7500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-8300 vs Core i5-7500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-8300 vs Core i5-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-8300
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Costs $61 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β Delivers 44.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β Draws 62W instead of 65W, a 3W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i5-7500
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (6,362 vs 6,370).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 32.0 vs 46.2 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8300.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-8300 better than Core i5-7500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8300 vs Core i5-7500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300
The Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $138.

Core i5-7500
The Core i5-7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,362 points. Launch price was $202.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-8300 and Core i5-7500 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-8300 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-7500 β a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7500 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-8300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-7500 uses Kaby Lake (2016β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300 scores 6,370 against the Core i5-7500's 6,362 β a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-8300. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-8300 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7500.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Core i5-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017β2019) | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) |
| PassMark | 6,370 | 6,362 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,327 | β |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i3-8300) and Intel 200 series,Intel 100 series (Core i5-7500).
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Core i5-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8300) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7500). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-8300) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7500) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300 targets Mainstream Desktop, Core i5-7500 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8300 rivals Ryzen 3 2300X.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Core i5-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-8300 was priced at $138, while the Core i5-7500 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($138 vs $199), Core i3-8300 was $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300 delivers 46.2 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-7500 β making the Core i3-8300 the 36.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Core i5-7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-31% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.2+44% | 32.0 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















