
Core i3-8300

Opteron 6276
Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6276 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6276 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6276: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-8300
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $788 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 473.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $788 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 62W instead of 115W, a 53W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6276 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6276, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6276
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,348 vs 6,370).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 46.2 PassMark/$ ($788 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌85.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 62W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8300.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-8300 better than Opteron 6276?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6276 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300
The Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $138.

Opteron 6276
The Opteron 6276 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,348 points. Launch price was $119.
Processing Power
The Core i3-8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6276 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6276 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-8300 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6276 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-8300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6276 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300 scores 6,370 against the Opteron 6276's 6,348 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-8300. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Opteron 6276 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+61% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per module) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 6,370 | 6,348 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,327 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-8300 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6276 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Opteron 6276 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8300) / not specified (Opteron 6276). The Core i3-8300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6276 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8300 rivals Ryzen 3 2300X.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Opteron 6276 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-8300 was priced at $138, while the Opteron 6276 came in at $788. On launch pricing ($138 vs $788), Core i3-8300 was $650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300 delivers 46.2 pts/$ vs 8.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 6276 — making the Core i3-8300 the 140.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-8300 | Opteron 6276 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-82% | $788 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.2+470% | 8.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















