Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6282 SE

Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6282 SE Performance Spectrum

Core i3-8300

4 / 4

6,370

0.0%

6,385

+0.2%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

FX-8320E

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6282 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6282 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $881 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
✅Delivers 636.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $1,019 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 140W, a 78W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Opteron 6282 SE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6282 SE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,370 vs 6,385).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6282 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6282 SE

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 46.2 PassMark/$ ($1,019 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌125.8% higher power demand at 140W vs 62W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-8300.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron 6282 SE better than Core i3-8300?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6282 SE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-8300 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron 6282 SE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6282 SE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron 6282 SE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Opteron 6282 SE comes in 638.4% more expensive on MSRP at $1,019 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-8300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 636.7% better value on paper (46.2 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-8300 vs Opteron 6282 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8300

The Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $138.

Opteron 6282 SE

The Opteron 6282 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,385 points. Launch price was $1,090.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6282 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6282 SE has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-8300 versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6282 SE — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-8300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300 scores 6,370 against the Opteron 6282 SE's 6,385 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron 6282 SE. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Opteron 6282 SE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+12%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+42%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	6,370	6,385
Geekbench 6 Single	1,327	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6282 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Opteron 6282 SE
Socket	LGA1151	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8300) / not specified (Opteron 6282 SE). The Core i3-8300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6282 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-8300 rivals Ryzen 3 2300X.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Opteron 6282 SE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Mainstream Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300 was priced at $138, while the Opteron 6282 SE came in at $1019. On launch pricing ($138 vs $1019), Core i3-8300 was $881 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300 delivers 46.2 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Opteron 6282 SE — making the Core i3-8300 the 152.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-8300	Opteron 6282 SE
MSRP	$138-86%	$1019
Performance per Dollar	46.2+633%	6.3
Release Date	2018	2011

Search Core i3-8300 on Amazon

Search Opteron 6282 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.