Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 3 1200

Intel

Core i3-8300

4 Cores4 Thrd62 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 1200

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
Ryzen family
·······

Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 3 1200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 3 1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 3 1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8300

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 62W instead of 65W, a 3W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 1200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,370 vs 6,407).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.2 vs 58.8 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Ryzen 3 1200

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $29 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.8 vs 46.2 PassMark/$ ($109 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1200 better than Core i3-8300?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-8300 is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1200 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 1200 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 1200 comes in $29 cheaper on MSRP at $109 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-8300 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 27.3% better value on MSRP (58.8 vs 46.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8300 vs Ryzen 3 1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-8300

The Core i3-8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,370 points. Launch price was $138.

AMD

Ryzen 3 1200

The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8300 and Ryzen 3 1200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i3-8300 versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-8300 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-8300 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8300 scores 6,370 against the Ryzen 3 1200's 6,407 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 3 1200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,327 vs 1,000, a 28.1% lead for the Core i3-8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-8300Ryzen 3 1200
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+19%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017)
PassMark
6,370
6,407
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,013
Geekbench 6 Single
1,327+33%
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8300 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-8300 versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1200 — the Ryzen 3 1200 supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-8300) vs 24 (Ryzen 3 1200) — the Ryzen 3 1200 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,H370,Q370,Z370,Z390 (Core i3-8300) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470 (Ryzen 3 1200).

FeatureCore i3-8300Ryzen 3 1200
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2666+11%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 3 1200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8300) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200). The Core i3-8300 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 1200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8300 targets Mainstream Desktop, Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8300 rivals Ryzen 3 2300X.

FeatureCore i3-8300Ryzen 3 1200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Desktop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-8300 was priced at $138, while the Ryzen 3 1200 came in at $109. On launch pricing ($138 vs $109), Ryzen 3 1200 was $29 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8300 delivers 46.2 pts/$ vs 58.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1200 — making the Ryzen 3 1200 the 24.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-8300Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP
$138
$109-21%
Performance per Dollar
46.2
58.8+27%
Release Date
2018
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.