Core i5-8279U vs Core i7-7700T

Intel

Core i5-8279U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-7700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-8279U vs Core i7-7700T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8279U vs Core i7-7700T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8279U vs Core i7-7700T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8279U

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,464 vs 7,517).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-7700T

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Core i5-8279U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Core i5-8279U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8279U better than Core i7-7700T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8279U is ahead with a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7700T pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i7-7700T also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-8279U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8279U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-7700T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8279U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-8279U vs Core i7-7700T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-8279U

The Core i5-8279U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,464 points. Launch price was $320.

Intel

Core i7-7700T

The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8279U and Core i7-7700T share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8279U versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8279U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-8279U uses the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7700T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8279U scores 7,464 against the Core i7-7700T's 7,517 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-7700T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8279U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T.

FeatureCore i5-8279UCore i7-7700T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+8%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
7,464
7,517
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,605
Geekbench 6 Single
1,066
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,643
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8279U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7700T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-8279UCore i7-7700T
Socket
FCBGA1528
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-8279U) / Yes (Core i7-7700T). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core i5-8279U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-8279UCore i7-7700T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes