Core i5-8279U
VS
Xeon E5-2608L v4

Core i5-8279U vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i5-8279U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

8 Cores16 Thrd50 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8279U is positioned at rank 596 and the Xeon E5-2608L v4 is on rank 529, so the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8279U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
99%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#584
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
786%
#585
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
775%
#586
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
711%
#587
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
708%
#588
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
701%
#590
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
677%
#591
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
650%
#592
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
648%
#593
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
631%
#596
Core i5-8279U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#608
Ryzen AI 5 330
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8370%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5743%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1730%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1370%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1199%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
687%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
678%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
610%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
594%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
585%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
583%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
578%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
100%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
98%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
96%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
94%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
94%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-8279U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-8279UXeon E5-2608L v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-8279UXeon E5-2608L v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8279U and Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i5-8279U

The Core i5-8279U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,464 points. Launch price was $320.

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

Processing Power

The Core i5-8279U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-8279U versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 87.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8279U. The Core i5-8279U uses the Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8279U scores 7,464 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-8279U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8279U vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

FeatureCore i5-8279UXeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+156%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
20 MB+233%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-U (2018−2019)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
7,464
7,447