Core i5-8400H vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8400H vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8400H vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8400H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 50W, a 5W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2608L v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2608L v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,447 vs 7,456).
❌Launch MSRP is still $363 MSRP, while Core i5-8400H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8400H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8400H better than Xeon E5-2608L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2608L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-8400H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-8400H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-8400H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8400H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2608L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-8400H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $363 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2608L v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8400H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8400H vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8400H

The Core i5-8400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,456 points. Launch price was $250.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-8400H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-8400H versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 89.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8400H. The Core i5-8400H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8400H scores 7,456 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-8400H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400H vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

Feature	Core i5-8400H	Xeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+163%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB+67%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,456	7,447
Cinebench R23 Multi	4,657	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,493	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,963	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-8400H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2608L v4). The Core i5-8400H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8400H targets Mobile.