Core i5-8400H vs Xeon E5-2667
Core i5-8400H
Xeon E5-2667
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-8400H is positioned at rank 142 and the Xeon E5-2667 is on rank 991, so the Core i5-8400H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8400H
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-8400H | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($31) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-8400H | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($31) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8400H and Xeon E5-2667
Core i5-8400H
The Core i5-8400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,456 points. Launch price was $250.
Xeon E5-2667
The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8400H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-8400H versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-8400H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-8400H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8400H scores 7,456 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-8400H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400H vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.
| Feature | Core i5-8400H | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+20% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15360 kB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 7,456 | 7,442 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,657 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,493 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,963 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8400H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i5-8400H versus DDR3 1600 MHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — the Core i5-8400H supports 29.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-8400H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-8400H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667) — the Xeon E5-2667 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel HM370,Intel QM370 (Core i5-8400H) and Intel C602,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-2667).
| Feature | Core i5-8400H | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 2666 MHz+33% | DDR3 1600 MHz |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 384 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-8400H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8400H targets Mobile, Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i5-8400H | Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-8400H and Xeon E5-2667
