
Core i5-8600K

FX-9590
Core i5-8600K vs FX-9590 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-8600K vs FX-9590 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-8600K vs FX-9590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-8600K
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $93 less on MSRP ($257 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.4 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($257 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 220W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while FX-9590 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9590 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,134 vs 10,194).
FX-9590
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 39.4 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $257 MSRP).
- ❌131.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-9590 better than Core i5-8600K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-8600K vs FX-9590 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8600K
The Core i5-8600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,134 points. Launch price was $257.

FX-9590
The FX-9590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,194 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-8600K packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the FX-9590 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-9590 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-8600K versus 5 GHz on the FX-9590 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the FX-9590 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i5-8600K uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-9590 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8600K scores 10,134 against the FX-9590's 10,194 — a 0.6% lead for the FX-9590.
| Feature | Core i5-8600K | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 5 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 10,134 | 10,194 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8600K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9590 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8600K | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8600K) / not specified (FX-9590). The Core i5-8600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the FX-9590 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8600K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-8600K rivals Ryzen 5 2600X.
| Feature | Core i5-8600K | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-8600K was priced at $257, while the FX-9590 came in at $350. On launch pricing ($257 vs $350), Core i5-8600K was $93 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-8600K delivers 39.4 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the FX-9590 — making the Core i5-8600K the 30.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-8600K | FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $257-27% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.4+35% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















