PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-8600K vs Xeon Silver 4110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-8600K vs Xeon Silver 4110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-8600K

2017

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Silver 4110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4110 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,134 vs 10,314).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 11 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4110, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $257 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4110

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Draws 85W instead of 95W, a 10W reduction.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-8600K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4110 better than Core i5-8600K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-8600K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Silver 4110 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Silver 4110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon Silver 4110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $257 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-8600K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (39.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 22.2% larger total L3 cache (11 MB vs 9 MB), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/6, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-8600K vs Xeon Silver 4110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-8600K

The Core i5-8600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,134 points. Launch price was $257.

Xeon Silver 4110

The Xeon Silver 4110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 10,314 points. Launch price was $501.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-8600K packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4110 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-8600K versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4110 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8600K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-8600K uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8600K scores 10,134 against the Xeon Silver 4110's 10,314 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Silver 4110. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-8600K vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4110.

Feature	Core i5-8600K	Xeon Silver 4110
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+43%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+71%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	9 MB (total)	11 MB+22%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+3100%	8 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	10,134	10,314+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,550	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8600K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4110 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-8600K versus 2400 on the Xeon Silver 4110 — the Core i5-8600K supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4110 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-8600K) vs 6 (Xeon Silver 4110). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-8600K) vs 48 (Xeon Silver 4110) — the Xeon Silver 4110 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z370,Z390 (Core i5-8600K) and C621 (Xeon Silver 4110).

Feature	Core i5-8600K	Xeon Silver 4110
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+11%	2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	48+200%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-8600K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Silver 4110 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8600K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4110). The Core i5-8600K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Silver 4110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8600K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-8600K rivals Ryzen 5 2600X.