Core i5-9300HF vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Core i5-9300HF vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U Performance Spectrum

Core i5-9300HF

4 / 8

7,255

+0.4%

7,224

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9300HF vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9300HF vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9300HF

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 1W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,224 vs 7,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌1400% higher power demand at 15W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-9300HF better than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is ahead with a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9300HF pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i5-9300HF also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9300HF is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-9300HF still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-9300HF comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-9300HF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-9300HF vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9300HF

The Core i5-9300HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,255 points. Launch price was $250.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,224 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-9300HF and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-9300HF versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-9300HF (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-9300HF uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-9300HF scores 7,255 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U's 7,224 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-9300HF. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i5-9300HF vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

Feature	Core i5-9300HF	Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	7,255	7,224
Geekbench 6 Single	1,288	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9300HF uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-9300HF	Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Socket	BGA1440	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9300HF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U). Primary use case: Core i5-9300HF targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9300HF rivals Ryzen 5 3550H.