Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X7560

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X7560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X7560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-9400T

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon X7560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7560, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $182 MSRP, while Xeon X7560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7560

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,110 vs 8,180).
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-9400T better than Xeon X7560?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X7560 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-9400T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-9400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 6 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-9400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-9400T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $182 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X7560 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-9400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 6 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-9400T vs Xeon X7560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9400T

The Core i5-9400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,180 points. Launch price was $182.

Xeon X7560

The Xeon X7560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 8,110 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-9400T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon X7560 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7560 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-9400T versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon X7560 — a 24.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-9400T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The Core i5-9400T is built on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-9400T scores 8,180 against the Xeon X7560's 8,110 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-9400T. L3 cache: 9 MB (total) on the Core i5-9400T vs 24 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7560.

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Xeon X7560
Cores / Threads	6 / 6	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+27%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2.27 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	9 MB (total)	24 MB L3 Cache+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	—
PassMark	8,180	8,110

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-9400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7560 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-9400T versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X7560 — the Core i5-9400T supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-9400T) vs 4 (Xeon X7560).

Feature	Core i5-9400T	Xeon X7560
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+100%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-9400T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7560). The Core i5-9400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9400T targets Desktop, Xeon X7560 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7560 rivals Core i7-980X.