Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4820K

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4820K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4820K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060NG7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 130W, a 128W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4820K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).

Core i7-4820K

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,515 vs 6,540).
❌Launch MSRP is still $332 MSRP, while Core i7-1060NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 130W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060NG7 better than Core i7-4820K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4820K is ahead with a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1060NG7 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-4820K also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1060NG7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060NG7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-1060NG7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $332 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core i7-4820K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (19.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060NG7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4820K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060NG7

The Core i7-1060NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 6,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1060NG7 and Core i7-4820K share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060NG7 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4820K (base: 1.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-1060NG7 uses the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4820K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060NG7 scores 6,540 against the Core i7-4820K's 6,515 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-1060NG7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-1060NG7 vs 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K.

Feature	Core i7-1060NG7	Core i7-4820K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+208%
L3 Cache	8 MB	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake Y (2020)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	6,540	6,515