Core i7-1060NG7 vs Xeon E3-1240L v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Xeon E3-1240L v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Xeon E3-1240L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060NG7

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,540 vs 6,547).

Xeon E3-1240L v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060NG7 better than Xeon E3-1240L v5?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240L v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1060NG7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240L v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060NG7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1060NG7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060NG7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Xeon E3-1240L v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060NG7

The Core i7-1060NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 6,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1240L v5

The Xeon E3-1240L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,547 points. Launch price was $278.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1060NG7 and Xeon E3-1240L v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060NG7 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240L v5 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060NG7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-1060NG7 uses the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240L v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060NG7 scores 6,540 against the Xeon E3-1240L v5's 6,547 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E3-1240L v5. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-1060NG7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240L v5.

Feature	Core i7-1060NG7	Xeon E3-1240L v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.1 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake Y (2020)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	6,540	6,547