Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4980HQ

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4980HQ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4980HQ: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1060NG7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 47W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-4980HQ

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,539 vs 6,540).
❌2250% higher power demand at 47W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060NG7 better than Core i7-4980HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4980HQ is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1060NG7 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1060NG7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060NG7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1060NG7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060NG7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1060NG7 vs Core i7-4980HQ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1060NG7

The Core i7-1060NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 6,540 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-4980HQ

The Core i7-4980HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,539 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1060NG7 and Core i7-4980HQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060NG7 versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-4980HQ — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4980HQ (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-1060NG7 uses the Ice Lake Y (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4980HQ uses Crystalwell (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1060NG7 scores 6,540 against the Core i7-4980HQ's 6,539 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-1060NG7. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-1060NG7 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4980HQ.

Feature	Core i7-1060NG7	Core i7-4980HQ
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake Y (2020)	Crystalwell (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,540	6,539