PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-1065G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,145 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1526 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1526 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-1065G7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Core i7-1065G7

2019

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1526 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-1065G7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,145 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1526 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i7-1065G7?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 98.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 462.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 98.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 462.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 98.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1526, 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-1065G7 Benchmark Check

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	185 FPS	284 FPS
medium	147 FPS	268 FPS
high	118 FPS	223 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	238 FPS
medium	117 FPS	200 FPS
high	93 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	159 FPS
medium	59 FPS	134 FPS
high	47 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	90 FPS

Open Core i7-1065G7 Open Core i7-13700K

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	143 FPS	689 FPS
medium	122 FPS	580 FPS
high	113 FPS	484 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	595 FPS
medium	107 FPS	525 FPS
high	100 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	348 FPS
medium	87 FPS	314 FPS
high	73 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	261 FPS

Open Core i7-1065G7 Open Core i7-13700K

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	204 FPS	648 FPS
medium	204 FPS	530 FPS
high	204 FPS	467 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	204 FPS	591 FPS
medium	204 FPS	491 FPS
high	204 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	371 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	434 FPS
medium	204 FPS	374 FPS
high	204 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	290 FPS

Open Core i7-1065G7 Open Core i7-13700K

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
1080p
low	204 FPS	970 FPS
medium	204 FPS	883 FPS
high	204 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	689 FPS
1440p
low	204 FPS	829 FPS
medium	204 FPS	740 FPS
high	204 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	204 FPS	567 FPS
medium	204 FPS	515 FPS
high	204 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	404 FPS

Open Core i7-1065G7 Open Core i7-13700K

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1065G7 and Core i7-13700K

Core i7-1065G7

The Core i7-1065G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,145 points. Launch price was $426.

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1065G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-1065G7 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-1065G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1065G7 scores 8,145 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 139.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1065G7 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.

Feature	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 24+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	5.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+162%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
PassMark	8,145	45,784+462%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,980

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1065G7 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1065G7	Core i7-13700K
Socket	FCBGA1526	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-1065G7) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-1065G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.