
Core i3-10105
Popular choices:

Core i7-1065G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10105
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1065G7 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Core i7-1065G7
2019Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,145 vs 8,242).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-10105
2021Core i7-1065G7
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1065G7 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,145 vs 8,242).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10105 better than Core i7-1065G7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 204 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10105 and Core i7-1065G7

Core i3-10105
Core i3-10105
The Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,242 points. Launch price was $122.

Core i7-1065G7
Core i7-1065G7
The Core i7-1065G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,145 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10105 and Core i7-1065G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-1065G7 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-10105 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1065G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105 scores 8,242 against the Core i7-1065G7's 8,145 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-10105. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1065G7.
| Feature | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+185% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
| PassMark | 8,242+1% | 8,145 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10105 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1065G7 uses FCBGA1526 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1526 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105) / not specified (Core i7-1065G7). The Core i3-10105 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-1065G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10105 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-10105 | Core i7-1065G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












