Core i3-10105 vs Core i7-1065G7

Intel

Core i3-10105

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-1065G7

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-10105

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1065G7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Core i7-1065G7

2019

Why buy it

  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10105 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,145 vs 8,242).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-10105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10105 better than Core i7-1065G7?
Yes. Core i3-10105 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 17.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-10105 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10105 is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10105 is the smarter buy today. Core i3-10105 is at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (67.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10105 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
1080p
low181 FPS185 FPS
medium143 FPS147 FPS
high113 FPS118 FPS
ultra92 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS148 FPS
medium119 FPS117 FPS
high95 FPS93 FPS
ultra78 FPS73 FPS
4K
low85 FPS69 FPS
medium72 FPS59 FPS
high57 FPS47 FPS
ultra44 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
1080p
low206 FPS143 FPS
medium206 FPS122 FPS
high206 FPS113 FPS
ultra174 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low206 FPS124 FPS
medium203 FPS107 FPS
high184 FPS100 FPS
ultra155 FPS82 FPS
4K
low199 FPS96 FPS
medium164 FPS87 FPS
high139 FPS73 FPS
ultra113 FPS57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
1080p
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS
1440p
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS
4K
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
1080p
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS
1440p
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS
4K
low206 FPS204 FPS
medium206 FPS204 FPS
high206 FPS204 FPS
ultra206 FPS204 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10105 and Core i7-1065G7

Intel

Core i3-10105

The Core i3-10105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,242 points. Launch price was $122.

Intel

Core i7-1065G7

The Core i7-1065G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,145 points. Launch price was $426.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10105 and Core i7-1065G7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-1065G7 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Core i3-10105 uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1065G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105 scores 8,242 against the Core i7-1065G7's 8,145 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-10105. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1065G7.

FeatureCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+13%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+185%
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Comet Lake-R (2021)
Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
PassMark
8,242+1%
8,145
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10105 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1065G7 uses FCBGA1526 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
Socket
LGA1200
FCBGA1526
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105) / not specified (Core i7-1065G7). The Core i3-10105 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-1065G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10105 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-10105Core i7-1065G7
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop