Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-1065G7

4 / 8

8,145

+0.9%

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

4 / 8

8,069

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1065G7

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1807B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,069 vs 8,145).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i7-1065G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1065G7 better than Ryzen Embedded V1807B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Embedded V1807B is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1065G7 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark. Core i7-1065G7 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1065G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1065G7 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-1065G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark. Ryzen Embedded V1807B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1065G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1065G7

The Core i7-1065G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1526. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,145 points. Launch price was $426.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

The Ryzen Embedded V1807B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,069 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1065G7 and Ryzen Embedded V1807B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-1065G7 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-1065G7 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.35 GHz). The Core i7-1065G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1065G7 scores 8,145 against the Ryzen Embedded V1807B's 8,069 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-1065G7. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1065G7 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B.

Feature	Core i7-1065G7	Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+3%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.35 GHz+158%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+300%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	8,145	8,069

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1065G7 uses the FCBGA1526 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.