Core i7-1068G7 vs FX-6330

Core i7-1068G7 vs FX-6330 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-1068G7

4 / 8

4,449

+0.4%

4,433

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1068G7 vs FX-6330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1068G7 vs FX-6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1068G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1068G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,433 vs 4,449).
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Core i7-1068G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1068G7 better than FX-6330?

Yes. Core i7-1068G7 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1068G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1068G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1068G7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-1068G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. FX-6330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (40.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1068G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1068G7 vs FX-6330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1068G7

The Core i7-1068G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,449 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1068G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6330 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6330 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068G7 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-1068G7 uses the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-6330 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1068G7 scores 4,449 against the FX-6330's 4,433 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-1068G7. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-1068G7	FX-6330
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.6 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,449	4,433

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1068G7 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6330 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.