Core i3-8100H vs Core i7-1068G7

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100H vs Core i7-1068G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100H vs Core i7-1068G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 28W, a 27W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Core i7-1068G7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1068G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,435 vs 4,449).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-1068G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2700% higher power demand at 28W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1068G7 better than Core i3-8100H?

Yes. Core i7-1068G7 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 19.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1068G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 19.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1068G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1068G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1068G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1068G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8100H vs Core i7-1068G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100H

The Core i3-8100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,435 points. Launch price was $225.

Core i7-1068G7

The Core i7-1068G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,449 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8100H packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-1068G7's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-8100H versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068G7 — a 31% clock advantage for the Core i7-1068G7 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-8100H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-1068G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100H scores 4,435 against the Core i7-1068G7's 4,449 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-1068G7. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-8100H vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1068G7.

Feature	Core i3-8100H	Core i7-1068G7
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.1 GHz+37%
Base Clock	3 GHz+30%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
PassMark	4,435	4,449

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1440 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i3-8100H	Core i7-1068G7
Socket	BGA1440	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100H) / not specified (Core i7-1068G7). The Core i3-8100H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-1068G7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100H targets Mobile.