Core i3-8100H vs FX-6330

Core i3-8100H vs FX-6330 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-8100H

4 / 4

4,435

0.0%

4,433

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-8100H vs FX-6330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-8100H vs FX-6330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-8100H

2018

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 125W, a 124W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while FX-6330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-6330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

FX-6330

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,433 vs 4,435).
❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Core i3-8100H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌12400% higher power demand at 125W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8100H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-8100H better than FX-6330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-6330 is ahead with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100H pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. FX-6330 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-8100H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-8100H is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-8100H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. FX-6330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (40.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-8100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/6. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-8100H vs FX-6330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-8100H

The Core i3-8100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,435 points. Launch price was $225.

FX-6330

The FX-6330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 December 2015 (9 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,433 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-8100H packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6330 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6330 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i3-8100H versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6330 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the FX-6330 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-8100H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6330 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8100H scores 4,435 against the FX-6330's 4,433 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-8100H. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-8100H vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-6330.

Feature	Core i3-8100H	FX-6330
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 6+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.2 GHz+40%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	6 MB	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB+500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	4,435	4,433

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8100H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6330 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-8100H	FX-6330
Socket	BGA1440	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100H) / not specified (FX-6330). The Core i3-8100H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the FX-6330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100H targets Mobile.