Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G Performance Spectrum

Core i7-10875H

8 / 16

14,509

0.0%

Core i5-9500T

Core i5-1155G7

Core i7-1250U

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

14,540

+0.2%

Ryzen Embedded V1756B

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10875H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,509 vs 14,540).
❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10875H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $176 MSRP, while Core i7-10875H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G better than Core i7-10875H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-10875H is ahead with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-10875H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G comes in at an unclear MSRP at $176 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-10875H is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (82.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10875H

The Core i7-10875H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,509 points. Launch price was $450.

Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,540 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10875H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10875H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10875H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-10875H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10875H scores 14,509 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G's 14,540 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10875H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G.

Feature	Core i7-10875H	Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	4.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+48%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Phoenix2 (2024)
PassMark	14,509	14,540

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10875H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.