Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-10875H

8 / 16

14,509

0.0%

Core i5-9500T

Core i5-1155G7

Core i7-1250U

Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition

14,699

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10875H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,509 vs 14,699).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10875H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-10875H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10875H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-10875H is ahead with a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10875H is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10875H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10875H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-10875H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10875H

The Core i7-10875H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,509 points. Launch price was $450.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10875H and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10875H versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-10875H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-10875H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10875H scores 14,509 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10875H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

Feature	Core i7-10875H	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+32%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	14,509	14,699+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10875H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.