
Core i7-11370H

Xeon E5-2630 v4
Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-11370H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $745 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $1,171 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 177.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $1,171 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 85W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-2630 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2630 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11370H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,368 vs 5,612).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($1,171 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- ❌203.6% higher power demand at 85W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11370H better than Xeon E5-2630 v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11370H
The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-2630 v4
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.
Processing Power
The Core i7-11370H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 43% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-11370H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11370H scores 11,548 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-11370H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,032, a 62% lead for the Core i7-11370H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,612 vs 5,368 (4.4% advantage for the Core i7-11370H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.
| Feature | Core i7-11370H | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 10 / 20+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+55% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+36% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 25 MB+108% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB+100% |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 11,548 | 11,434 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,563 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960+90% | 1,032 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,612+5% | 5,368 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11370H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11370H versus DDR4 1600/1866/2133 on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — the Core i7-11370H supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-11370H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11370H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-11370H) and C612 (Xeon E5-2630 v4).
| Feature | Core i7-11370H | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+100% | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1536 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11370H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity, Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.
| Feature | Core i7-11370H | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x / VT-d / EPT |
| Target Use | Productivity | Workstation / Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-11370H was priced at $426, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 came in at $1171. On launch pricing ($426 vs $1171), Core i7-11370H was $745 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11370H delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — making the Core i7-11370H the 94.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-11370H | Xeon E5-2630 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426-64% | $1171 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1+177% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













