Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4

Intel

Core i7-11370H

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2630 v4

10 Cores20 Thrd85 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $745 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $1,171 MSRP).
  • Delivers 177.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $1,171 MSRP).
  • Draws 28W instead of 85W, a 57W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-2630 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11370H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (5,368 vs 5,612).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($1,171 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • 203.6% higher power demand at 85W vs 28W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11370H better than Xeon E5-2630 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2630 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11370H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11370H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11370H is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-11370H is the better buy right now. Core i7-11370H comes in $745 cheaper on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $1,171 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 177.6% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11370H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

Intel

Xeon E5-2630 v4

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.

Processing Power

The Core i7-11370H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — a 43% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-11370H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11370H scores 11,548 against the Xeon E5-2630 v4's 11,434 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-11370H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,960 vs 1,032, a 62% lead for the Core i7-11370H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,612 vs 5,368 (4.4% advantage for the Core i7-11370H). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4.

FeatureCore i7-11370HXeon E5-2630 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+55%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
25 MB+108%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2.5 MB+100%
Process
10 nm SuperFin-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
11,548
11,434
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,563
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960+90%
1,032
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,612+5%
5,368
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11370H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11370H versus DDR4 1600/1866/2133 on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — the Core i7-11370H supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-11370H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11370H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-11370H) and C612 (Xeon E5-2630 v4).

FeatureCore i7-11370HXeon E5-2630 v4
Socket
FCBGA1449
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+100%
DDR4 1600/1866/2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
1536 GB+2300%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
40+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11370H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity, Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

FeatureCore i7-11370HXeon E5-2630 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Productivity
Workstation / Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-11370H was priced at $426, while the Xeon E5-2630 v4 came in at $1171. On launch pricing ($426 vs $1171), Core i7-11370H was $745 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11370H delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v4 — making the Core i7-11370H the 94.1% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-11370HXeon E5-2630 v4
MSRP
$426-64%
$1171
Performance per Dollar
27.1+177%
9.8
Release Date
2021
2016

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.