Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-4628L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-4628L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-4628L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 75W, a 47W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-4628L v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 35 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4628L v4, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Xeon E5-4628L v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-4628L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+191.7% larger total L3 cache (35 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,503 vs 11,548).
❌167.9% higher power demand at 75W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11370H better than Xeon E5-4628L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4628L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11370H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11370H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11370H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11370H is the better buy right now. Core i7-11370H comes in at an unclear MSRP at $426 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11370H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 14/28, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-4628L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-4628L v4

The Xeon E5-4628L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,503 points. Launch price was $2,535.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11370H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4628L v4 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon E5-4628L v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-4628L v4 — a 90.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H. The Core i7-11370H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-4628L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11370H scores 11,548 against the Xeon E5-4628L v4's 11,503 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-11370H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H vs 35 MB on the Xeon E5-4628L v4.

Feature	Core i7-11370H	Xeon E5-4628L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	14 / 28+250%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+167%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	35 MB+192%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	3.5 MB+180%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	11,548	11,503
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,563	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,612	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H) / not specified (Xeon E5-4628L v4). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-4628L v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.