Core i7-11700T vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11700T vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11700T vs Xeon E5-4667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11700T

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Xeon E5-4667 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,393 vs 15,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.7 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $195 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Delivers 152.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 47.7 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-11700T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11700T better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4667 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11700T is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-11700T comes in 152.3% more expensive on MSRP at $323 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-4667 v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 152.4% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 47.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2015) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11700T vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11700T

The Core i7-11700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,393 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11700T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11700T versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 45.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700T (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-11700T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11700T scores 15,393 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-4667 v3. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700T vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Core i7-11700T	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+59%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,393	15,397
Geekbench 6 Single	1,497	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11700T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-11700T	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	LGA1200	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11700T) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v3). The Core i7-11700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11700T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11700T rivals Ryzen 7 5700G.

Feature	Core i7-11700T	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 750	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-11700T was priced at $323, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($323 vs $128), Xeon E5-4667 v3 was $195 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11700T delivers 47.7 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 86.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-11700T	Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP	$323	$128-60%
Performance per Dollar	47.7	120.3+152%
Release Date	2021	2015

Search Core i7-11700T on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4667 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.