Core i7-11800H vs Core i9-11900H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11800H vs Core i9-11900H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11800H vs Core i9-11900H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11800H

2021

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Core i9-11900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,838 vs 20,009).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Core i9-11900H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11800H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900H better than Core i7-11800H?

Yes. Core i9-11900H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-11900H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-11900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11800H vs Core i9-11900H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11800H

The Core i7-11800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,838 points. Launch price was $395.

Core i9-11900H

The Core i9-11900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,009 points. Launch price was $546.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-11800H and Core i9-11900H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11800H versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900H — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900H (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture using a 10 nm SuperFin process. In PassMark, the Core i7-11800H scores 19,838 against the Core i9-11900H's 20,009 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-11900H. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-11800H	Core i9-11900H
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm SuperFin
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark	19,838	20,009
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,180	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,896	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,795	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1787 socket with PCIe 4.0.

Feature	Core i7-11800H	Core i9-11900H
Socket	FCBGA1787	FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-11800H) / not specified (Core i9-11900H). The Core i7-11800H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Core i9-11900H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-11800H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.