Core i7-11800H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11800H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11800H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11800H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 750, while Xeon E5-2699 v3 needs a discrete GPU.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2699 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,838 vs 20,028).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v3, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11800H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2699 v3 better than Core i7-11800H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2699 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2699 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11800H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11800H vs Xeon E5-2699 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11800H

The Core i7-11800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,838 points. Launch price was $395.

Xeon E5-2699 v3

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 20,028 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11800H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11800H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-11800H (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-11800H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11800H scores 19,838 against the Xeon E5-2699 v3's 20,028 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2699 v3. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-11800H vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699 v3.

Feature	Core i7-11800H	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+28%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.3 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	45 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	19,838	20,028
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,180	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,896	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,795	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11800H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11800H versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v3 — the Core i7-11800H supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2699 v3 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-11800H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2699 v3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11800H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v3) — the Xeon E5-2699 v3 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM580,HM570,WM590 (Core i7-11800H) and C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v3).

Feature	Core i7-11800H	Xeon E5-2699 v3
Socket	FCBGA1787	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+33%	2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11800H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-11800H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the Xeon E5-2699 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11800H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-11800H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H; Xeon E5-2699 v3 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.