Core i7-1260P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1260P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1260P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1260P

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 28W instead of 105W, a 77W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $432 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4809 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1260P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (16,471 vs 16,592).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
❌275% higher power demand at 105W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-1260P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1260P better than Xeon E7-4809 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-4809 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1260P is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1260P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 34.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1260P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1260P is the better buy right now. Core i7-1260P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $432 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 34.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (38.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1260P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-1260P vs Xeon E7-4809 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1260P

The Core i7-1260P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,592 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E7-4809 v2

The Xeon E7-4809 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to none. L3 cache: 12 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 16,471 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1260P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1260P has 6 more cores. The Core i7-1260P is built on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-1260P scores 16,592 against the Xeon E7-4809 v2's 16,471 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-1260P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-1260P vs 12 MB on the Xeon E7-4809 v2.

Feature	Core i7-1260P	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Cores / Threads	12 / 16+100%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	none
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+11%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+50%	12 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-P (2022)	—
PassMark	16,592	16,471
Geekbench 6 Single	2,424	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,532	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1260P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1260P	Xeon E7-4809 v2
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-1260P) / not specified (Xeon E7-4809 v2). The Core i7-1260P includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E7-4809 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1260P targets High Performance Laptop.