
Core i7-1260P

Xeon Gold 6134
Core i7-1260P vs Xeon Gold 6134 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-1260P vs Xeon Gold 6134 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-1260P vs Xeon Gold 6134: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-1260P
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,782 less on MSRP ($432 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 414.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 7.5 PassMark/$ ($432 MSRP vs $2,214 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6134, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6134
2017Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1260P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,519 vs 16,592).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 38.4 PassMark/$ ($2,214 MSRP vs $432 MSRP).
- ❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-1260P moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1260P better than Xeon Gold 6134?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-1260P vs Xeon Gold 6134 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1260P
The Core i7-1260P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,592 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6134
The Xeon Gold 6134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,519 points. Launch price was $2,214.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1260P packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-1260P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-1260P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6134 — a 23.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-1260P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-1260P uses the Alder Lake-P (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1260P scores 16,592 against the Xeon Gold 6134's 16,519 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-1260P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-1260P vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6134.
| Feature | Core i7-1260P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+27% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24.75 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-P (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 16,592 | 16,519 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,532 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1260P uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6134 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-1260P versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6134 — the Core i7-1260P supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6134 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-1260P) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6134). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-1260P) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6134) — the Xeon Gold 6134 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Adler Lake-P PCH (Core i7-1260P) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6134).
| Feature | Core i7-1260P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6134 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-1260P includes integrated graphics (Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon Gold 6134 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1260P targets High Performance Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-1260P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Performance Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-1260P was priced at $432, while the Xeon Gold 6134 came in at $2214. On launch pricing ($432 vs $2214), Core i7-1260P was $1782 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1260P delivers 38.4 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6134 — making the Core i7-1260P the 134.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-1260P | Xeon Gold 6134 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $432-80% | $2214 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4+412% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














