
Core i7-12700E

Xeon W-3245M
Core i7-12700E vs Xeon W-3245M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-12700E vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-12700E vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-12700E
2022Why buy it
- ✅+8.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $4,688 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1482.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 90.1 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-3245M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 20,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 90.1 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700E better than Xeon W-3245M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-12700E vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-12700E
The Core i7-12700E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 28,302 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3245M
The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700E packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-12700E versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700E (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-12700E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700E scores 28,302 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 18,500 (7.8% advantage for the Core i7-12700E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,202 vs 1,474, a 39.6% lead for the Core i7-12700E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,981 vs 11,572 (3.5% advantage for the Core i7-12700E). L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700E vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.
| Feature | Core i7-12700E | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+4% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total)+14% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1180% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 28,302 | 28,494 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000+8% | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,202+49% | 1,474 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,981+4% | 11,572 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-12700E versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Core i7-12700E supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700E) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700E) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: R680E,Q670,H610E (Core i7-12700E) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).
| Feature | Core i7-12700E | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-12700E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12700E targets Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700E rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i7-12700E | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Industrial Computing / Professional Desktop | Professional Workstation / Mac Pro |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-12700E was priced at $314, while the Xeon W-3245M came in at $5002. On launch pricing ($314 vs $5002), Core i7-12700E was $4688 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700E delivers 90.1 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Core i7-12700E the 176.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700E | Xeon W-3245M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $314-94% | $5002 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.1+1481% | 5.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















