
Core i7-12700F
Popular choices:

Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Laminar RM1), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,332 vs 34,347).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-12700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 96.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-12700F.
Core i7-12700F
2022Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($314 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($314 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Laminar RM1), unlike Core i7-12700K.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i7-12700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (30,332 vs 34,347).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 84.0 vs 96.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $314 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-12700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than Core i7-12700F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 312 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 758 FPS | 797 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 553 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 415 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 758 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 758 FPS | 802 FPS |
| high | 672 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 628 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700F and Core i7-12700K

Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F
The Core i7-12700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 30,332 points. Launch price was $386.

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-12700F and Core i7-12700K share an identical 12-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-12700F versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-12700F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700F scores 30,332 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 12.4% lead for the Core i7-12700K. Both processors carry 25 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) |
| PassMark | 30,332 | 34,347+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,388 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,448 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-12700F versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700F) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K).
| Feature | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-12700F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i7-12700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12700F targets High-performance Gaming / Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700F rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-performance Gaming / Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700F launched at $314 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($314 vs $409), the Core i7-12700F is $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700F delivers 96.6 pts/$ vs 84.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700K — making the Core i7-12700F the 14% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700F | Core i7-12700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $314-23% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.6+15% | 84.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













