
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 7303P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $185 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 36,487).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7303P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 7303P
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $185 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 36.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7303P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+6.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 36,487).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7303P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7303P better than Core i7-12700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 197 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 806 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 696 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 608 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 337 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 7303P

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7303P
EPYC 7303P
The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7303P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7303P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7303P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 7303P's 36,487 — a 6% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+47% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+156% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 36,487+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7303P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 3200 on the EPYC 7303P — the Core i7-12700K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7303P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7303P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7303P) — the EPYC 7303P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP3 (EPYC 7303P).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7303P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7303P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, IOMMU |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7303P debuted at $594. On MSRP ($409 vs $594), the Core i7-12700K is $185 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 61.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7303P — making the Core i7-12700K the 31% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7303P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-31% | $594 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+37% | 61.4 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













