
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 7401
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,091 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 55,280).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 7401
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,091 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 127.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 36.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 155W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 55,280).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7401, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.9 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌24% higher power demand at 155W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than EPYC 7401?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 75 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 834 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 758 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 7401

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7401
EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7401 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7401 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 — a 50% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7401 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 7401's 55,280 — a 46.7% lead for the EPYC 7401. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7401.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+67% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+156% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 55,280+61% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7401 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i7-12700K versus 2666 on the EPYC 7401 — the Core i7-12700K supports 57.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7401 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7401). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7401) — the EPYC 7401 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP3 (EPYC 7401).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+80% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 2048+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7401 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7401 debuted at $1500. On MSRP ($409 vs $1500), the Core i7-12700K is $1091 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 36.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7401 — making the Core i7-12700K the 78% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-73% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+128% | 36.9 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













