
Core i7-12700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12700K
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,519 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 768.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9184X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+38.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2972% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12700K
2021EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,519 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 768.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9184X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+38.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2972% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (34,347 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-12700K better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 630 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 533 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 797 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 472 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 802 FPS | 867 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 678 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and EPYC 9184X

Core i7-12700K
Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 9184X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9184X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9184X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the EPYC 9184X's 47,665 — a 32.5% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 20 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+19% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+1% | 3.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+2972% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 34,347 | 47,665+39% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9184X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-12700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9184X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-12700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9184X) — the EPYC 9184X offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9184X).
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 6144+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9184X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9184X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X; EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9184X debuted at $4928. On MSRP ($409 vs $4928), the Core i7-12700K is $4519 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 9.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9184X — making the Core i7-12700K the 158.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-12700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-92% | $4928 |
| Performance per Dollar | 84.0+766% | 9.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













