PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 204.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 34,347).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-12700K

2021

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +24.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $390 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 204.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.0 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-12700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,066 vs 34,347).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 84.0 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-12700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-12700K better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-12700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-12700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 24.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12700K is the better fit. You are getting 55.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-12700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-12700K is $390 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it gives you a 24.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 204.1% better value on MSRP (84.0 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-12700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-12700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	314 FPS	175 FPS
medium	295 FPS	156 FPS
high	246 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	269 FPS	143 FPS
medium	225 FPS	121 FPS
high	182 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	145 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	65 FPS
medium	142 FPS	59 FPS
high	109 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	630 FPS	398 FPS
medium	533 FPS	357 FPS
high	450 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	410 FPS	252 FPS
1440p
low	536 FPS	339 FPS
medium	475 FPS	309 FPS
high	403 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	349 FPS	219 FPS
4K
low	312 FPS	217 FPS
medium	280 FPS	197 FPS
high	266 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	145 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	797 FPS	552 FPS
medium	633 FPS	539 FPS
high	556 FPS	501 FPS
ultra	472 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	552 FPS
medium	565 FPS	464 FPS
high	490 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	367 FPS
4K
low	510 FPS	420 FPS
medium	425 FPS	334 FPS
high	381 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	321 FPS	252 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
1080p
low	859 FPS	552 FPS
medium	802 FPS	552 FPS
high	699 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	628 FPS	528 FPS
1440p
low	760 FPS	552 FPS
medium	678 FPS	552 FPS
high	590 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	423 FPS
4K
low	535 FPS	444 FPS
medium	488 FPS	408 FPS
high	437 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	318 FPS

Open Core i7-12700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12700K and Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Core i7-12700K

The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-12700K packs 12 cores / 20 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-12700K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12700K scores 34,347 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 43.5% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	12 / 20	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5 GHz+32%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB (total)	32 MB+28%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	34,347+56%	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The Core i7-12700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

Feature	Core i7-12700K	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-12700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 debuted at $799. On MSRP ($409 vs $799), the Core i7-12700K is $390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-12700K delivers 84.0 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Core i7-12700K the 101% better value option.