Core i7-13650HX
VS
EPYC 9015

Core i7-13650HX vs EPYC 9015

Intel

Core i7-13650HX

14 Cores20 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 9015

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13650HX

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
106%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
105%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
104%
#90
Core i7-13650HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
93%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9015

#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
107%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
105%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
105%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
104%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
103%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
103%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
102%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
102%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
101%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
101%
#246
EPYC 9015
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
97%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
97%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
97%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
97%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
97%
#253
Xeon W-2150B
MSRP: $499|Avg: $400
94%
#255
Xeon 6517P
MSRP: $1195|Avg: $1195
94%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
93%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
92%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
91%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9015 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-13650HXEPYC 9015
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-13650HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-13650HXEPYC 9015
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13650HX and EPYC 9015

Intel

Core i7-13650HX

The Core i7-13650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,538 points. Launch price was $485.

AMD

EPYC 9015

The EPYC 9015 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,505 points. Launch price was $527.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13650HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 9015 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13650HX has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13650HX versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9015 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13650HX (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13650HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9015 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13650HX scores 30,538 against the EPYC 9015's 30,505 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13650HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,999 vs 15,000 (33.3% advantage for the Core i7-13650HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,524 vs 1,400, a 57.3% lead for the Core i7-13650HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,200 vs 11,000 (38.2% advantage for the Core i7-13650HX). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13650HX vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9015.

FeatureCore i7-13650HXEPYC 9015
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+20%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
Turin (2024)
PassMark
30,538
30,505
Cinebench R23 Multi
20,999+40%
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,524+80%
1,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,200+47%
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13650HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9015 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9015 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13650HX) vs 12 (EPYC 9015). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13650HX) vs 128 (EPYC 9015) — the EPYC 9015 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i7-13650HX) and SP5 platform (EPYC 9015).

FeatureCore i7-13650HXEPYC 9015
Socket
FCBGA1964
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
12+500%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13650HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9015 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13650HX) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9015). The Core i7-13650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)), while the EPYC 9015 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13650HX targets High-end Content Creation Laptop, EPYC 9015 targets Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads. Direct competitor: Core i7-13650HX rivals Ryzen 7 7840HX; EPYC 9015 rivals Xeon 6.

FeatureCore i7-13650HXEPYC 9015
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use
High-end Content Creation Laptop
Next-gen Data Center / AI Workloads