
Core i7-1365UE

Core i7-9750HF
Core i7-1365UE vs Core i7-9750HF Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-1365UE vs Core i7-9750HF FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-1365UE vs Core i7-9750HF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-1365UE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,379 vs 10,393).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.2 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).
Core i7-9750HF
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($395 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.3 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1365UE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i7-1365UE moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1365UE better than Core i7-9750HF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-1365UE vs Core i7-9750HF Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1365UE
The Core i7-1365UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 10,379 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-9750HF
The Core i7-9750HF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 10,393 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1365UE packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-9750HF offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1365UE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-1365UE versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-9750HF — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-1365UE (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-1365UE uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-9750HF uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1365UE scores 10,379 against the Core i7-9750HF's 10,393 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-9750HF. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-1365UE | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 10,379 | 10,393 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,915 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,149 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1365UE uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-9750HF uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1365UE | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-1365UE) / Yes (Core i7-9750HF).
| Feature | Core i7-1365UE | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-1365UE was priced at $429, while the Core i7-9750HF came in at $395. On launch pricing ($429 vs $395), Core i7-9750HF was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-1365UE delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-9750HF — making the Core i7-9750HF the 8.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-1365UE | Core i7-9750HF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $429 | $395-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.2 | 26.3+9% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













