PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅Delivers 182.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Core i9-10900E

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅Delivers 182.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-10900E?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 27.5% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data, 136.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.5% more average FPS across 45 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 136.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $488 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.5% average FPS lead across 45 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 182.6% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 39.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Core i9-10900E Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
1080p
low	284 FPS	164 FPS
medium	268 FPS	145 FPS
high	223 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	139 FPS
medium	200 FPS	119 FPS
high	159 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	76 FPS
medium	134 FPS	70 FPS
high	103 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900E

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
1080p
low	689 FPS	483 FPS
medium	580 FPS	420 FPS
high	484 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	419 FPS
medium	525 FPS	368 FPS
high	441 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	276 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	258 FPS
medium	314 FPS	227 FPS
high	295 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	185 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900E

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
1080p
low	648 FPS	483 FPS
medium	530 FPS	483 FPS
high	467 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	449 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	483 FPS
medium	491 FPS	483 FPS
high	427 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	403 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	483 FPS
medium	374 FPS	408 FPS
high	339 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	301 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900E

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
1080p
low	970 FPS	483 FPS
medium	883 FPS	483 FPS
high	766 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	483 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	483 FPS
medium	740 FPS	483 FPS
high	642 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	483 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	483 FPS
medium	515 FPS	483 FPS
high	463 FPS	445 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	389 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900E

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-10900E

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-10900E

The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-10900E offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10900E uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-10900E's 19,332 — a 81.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+60%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+15%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+21%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+50%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	45,784+137%	19,332
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900E — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 16 (Core i9-10900E) — the Core i7-13700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900E debuted at $488. On MSRP ($409 vs $488), the Core i7-13700K is $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 39.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900E — making the Core i7-13700K the 95.4% better value option.