Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X

Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3175X

28 Cores56 Thrd255 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 627.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 125W instead of 255W, a 130W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 31,350).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
  • 104% higher power demand at 255W vs 125W.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-3175X?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3175X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700K comes in $2,590 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $2,999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3175X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 627.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Intel

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 31,350 (1.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,467, a 63.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 17,358 (8.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

FeatureCore i7-13700KXeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads
16 / 24
28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+42%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+10%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)
38.5 MB (total)+28%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
45,784
46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
31,350+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,846+94%
1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980+9%
17,358
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Core i7-13700K supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

FeatureCore i7-13700KXeon W-3175X
Socket
LGA1700
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+110%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
512 GB+167%
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
48+140%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3175X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureCore i7-13700KXeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700K was priced at $409, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($409 vs $2999), Core i7-13700K was $2590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Core i7-13700K the 151.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-13700KXeon W-3175X
MSRP
$409-86%
$2999
Performance per Dollar
111.9+627%
15.4
Release Date
2022
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.