
Core i7-13700K

Xeon W-3175X
Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,590 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 627.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 255W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 31,350).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3175X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌104% higher power demand at 255W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-3175X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700K vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 31,350 (1.1% advantage for the Xeon W-3175X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,467, a 63.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 17,358 (8.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 28 / 56+75% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+42% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 38.5 MB (total)+28% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 46,125 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 31,350+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+94% | 1,467 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+9% | 17,358 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Core i7-13700K supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+110% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 512 GB+167% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3175X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3175X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700K was priced at $409, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($409 vs $2999), Core i7-13700K was $2590 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Core i7-13700K the 151.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-86% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+627% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















