Core i7-13700K
EPYC 73F3
Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 73F3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 73F3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 73F3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,112 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 754.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 240W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 46,103).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 73F3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 73F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌92% higher power demand at 240W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 73F3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 73F3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 73F3's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+35% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+753% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 46,103 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the Core i7-13700K supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 73F3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 73F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700K was priced at $409, while the EPYC 73F3 came in at $3521. On launch pricing ($409 vs $3521), Core i7-13700K was $3112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the Core i7-13700K the 158.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-88% | $3521 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+754% | 13.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700K and EPYC 73F3
