PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $289 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,476 vs 18,980).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Core i9-10900T

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $289 less on MSRP ($120 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($120 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 122.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $120 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,476 vs 18,980).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-10900T?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 31.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 153.9% better Geekbench multi-core, 210.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 31.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 153.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-10900T makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-13700K is 240.8% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $120 MSRP, and it gives you a 31.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-10900T is also 9.6% better value on MSRP (122.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Core i9-10900T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
1080p
low	284 FPS	183 FPS
medium	268 FPS	149 FPS
high	223 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	149 FPS
medium	200 FPS	118 FPS
high	159 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	83 FPS
medium	134 FPS	72 FPS
high	103 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
1080p
low	689 FPS	290 FPS
medium	580 FPS	242 FPS
high	484 FPS	207 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	250 FPS
medium	525 FPS	215 FPS
high	441 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	159 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	155 FPS
medium	314 FPS	133 FPS
high	295 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	110 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
1080p
low	648 FPS	368 FPS
medium	530 FPS	368 FPS
high	467 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	368 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	368 FPS
medium	491 FPS	368 FPS
high	427 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	368 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	368 FPS
medium	374 FPS	368 FPS
high	339 FPS	340 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	274 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
1080p
low	970 FPS	368 FPS
medium	883 FPS	368 FPS
high	766 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	368 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	368 FPS
medium	740 FPS	368 FPS
high	642 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	368 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	368 FPS
medium	515 FPS	368 FPS
high	463 FPS	368 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	368 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core i9-10900T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-10900T

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-10900T

The Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 14,727 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-10900T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i9-10900T — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-10900T's 14,727 — a 102.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,710, a 49.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 7,476 (87% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 20 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i9-10900T.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+60%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+17%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+79%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+50%	20 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	—
PassMark	45,784+211%	14,727
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+66%	1,710
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+154%	7,476

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900T — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 16 (Core i9-10900T) — the Core i7-13700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Z490,H470,B460,H410,Z590,B560,H510 (Core i9-10900T).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs Yes (Core i9-10900T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core i9-10900T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900T debuted at $120. On MSRP ($409 vs $120), the Core i9-10900T is $289 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 122.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900T — making the Core i9-10900T the 9.2% better value option.