
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-13900HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+5.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i9-13900HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Core i9-13900HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (29,493 vs 31,000).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-13900HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core i9-13900HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-13900HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (29,493 vs 31,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900HX better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 311 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 112 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 145 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 762 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 329 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1012 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 905 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 792 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 704 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 646 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 568 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 491 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 430 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-13900HX

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-13900HX
Core i9-13900HX
The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-13900HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-13900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-13900HX's 42,437 — a 7.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 29,493 (5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,878, a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-13900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 14,944 (23.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 32+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784+8% | 42,437 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+5% | 29,493 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 2,878+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+27% | 14,944 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-13900HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-13900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













