
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+6.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌525% higher power demand at 125W vs 20W.
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 125W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,678 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core Ultra 5 225H
2025Why buy it
- ✅+6.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 125W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 225H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌525% higher power demand at 125W vs 20W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,678 vs 2,846).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,526 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core Ultra 5 225H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 685 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 327 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 720 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 383 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 720 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 720 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 720 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 225H

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H
The Core Ultra 5 225H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,802 points. Launch price was $385.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225H — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 5 225H's 28,802 — a 45.5% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 14,526 (72.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,678, a 6.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 12,337 (42.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 225H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+14% | 14 / 14 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+10% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+67% | 18 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+59% | 28,802 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+113% | 14,526 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+6% | 2,678 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+54% | 12,337 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 225H) — the Core Ultra 5 225H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 225H).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225H). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel Arc 130T GPU (Core Ultra 5 225H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225H targets Professional Content Creation Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core Ultra 5 225H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 5 225H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel Arc 130T GPU |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Professional Content Creation Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













