PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
38.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 31,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Core i7-13700K

2022

Core Ultra 5 228V

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +38.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 94.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
38.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 31,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core Ultra 5 228V?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 38.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 212.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 170.0% higher PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 38.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 212.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 38.6% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $295 MSRP, and it gives you a 38.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 94.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 57.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 228V is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 228V Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	284 FPS	180 FPS
medium	268 FPS	145 FPS
high	223 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	148 FPS
medium	200 FPS	117 FPS
high	159 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	83 FPS
medium	134 FPS	71 FPS
high	103 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	689 FPS	212 FPS
medium	580 FPS	176 FPS
high	484 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	181 FPS
medium	525 FPS	154 FPS
high	441 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	137 FPS
medium	314 FPS	122 FPS
high	295 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	100 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	648 FPS	424 FPS
medium	530 FPS	424 FPS
high	467 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	424 FPS
medium	491 FPS	424 FPS
high	427 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	424 FPS
medium	374 FPS	384 FPS
high	339 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core Ultra 5 228V

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
1080p
low	970 FPS	424 FPS
medium	883 FPS	424 FPS
high	766 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	424 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	424 FPS
medium	740 FPS	424 FPS
high	642 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	424 FPS
medium	515 FPS	424 FPS
high	463 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	408 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Core Ultra 5 228V

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 5 228V

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 5 228V

The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 228V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 5 228V's 16,955 — a 91.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 9,932 (102.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,585, a 9.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 10,053 (61.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 8
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+20%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+275%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)+25%
Process	Intel 7 nm	3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	45,784+170%	16,955
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+212%	9,932
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+10%	2,585
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+89%	10,053

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 5 228V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) — the Core i7-13700K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+500%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20+150%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 228V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Core Ultra 5 228V
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Arc 130V
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 228V debuted at $295. On MSRP ($409 vs $295), the Core Ultra 5 228V is $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 57.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 228V — making the Core i7-13700K the 64.3% better value option.