
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 265KF
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 265KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 35,315).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 154.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 154.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($379 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core Ultra 7 265KF needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 154.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($379 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 265KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 35,315).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 154.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 265KF better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 491 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 395 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 292 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 617 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 337 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1128 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 808 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 789 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 489 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 432 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 7 265KF

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,690 points. Launch price was $379.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 20 cores / 20 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265KF has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265KF — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 7 265KF's 58,690 — a 24.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 35,315 (13% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 3,055, a 7.1% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 20,373 (7.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265KF). Both processors carry 30 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 20 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+50% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 58,690+28% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 35,315+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 3,055+7% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | 20,373+7% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 7 265KF) — the Core Ultra 7 265KF offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel Z890 (Core Ultra 7 265KF).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core Ultra 7 265KF requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core Ultra 7 265KF rivals Ryzen 7 9700X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 265KF debuted at $379. On MSRP ($409 vs $379), the Core Ultra 7 265KF is $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 154.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 265KF — making the Core Ultra 7 265KF the 32.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 265KF |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $379-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | 154.9+38% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













