Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 7C13

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7C13

64 Cores128 Thrd225 WWMax: 3.68 GHz2021

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

0.0%

76,363

+66.8%

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,591 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 193.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 37,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7C13, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7C13

2021

Why buy it

✅+94.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 7C13

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,591 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 193.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 38.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+94.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 37,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7C13, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 31 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 7C13?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7C13 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7C13 is the better fit. You are getting 94.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $1,591 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and it gives you a 23.2% average FPS lead across 31 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7C13 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 94.9% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 193.2% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 38.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 7C13 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
1080p
low	284 FPS	195 FPS
medium	268 FPS	159 FPS
high	223 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	160 FPS
medium	200 FPS	125 FPS
high	159 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	72 FPS
medium	134 FPS	60 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7C13

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
1080p
low	689 FPS	267 FPS
medium	580 FPS	235 FPS
high	484 FPS	193 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	219 FPS
medium	525 FPS	198 FPS
high	441 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	133 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	135 FPS
medium	314 FPS	124 FPS
high	295 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	94 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7C13

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
1080p
low	648 FPS	837 FPS
medium	530 FPS	698 FPS
high	467 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	574 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	602 FPS
medium	491 FPS	500 FPS
high	427 FPS	459 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	401 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	430 FPS
medium	374 FPS	336 FPS
high	339 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	243 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7C13

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
1080p
low	970 FPS	977 FPS
medium	883 FPS	886 FPS
high	766 FPS	761 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	659 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	753 FPS
medium	740 FPS	657 FPS
high	642 FPS	560 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	481 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	541 FPS
medium	515 FPS	481 FPS
high	463 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7C13

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 7C13

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7C13

The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7C13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 — a 37.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7C13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 7C13's 76,363 — a 50.1% lead for the EPYC 7C13. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,538, a 59.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 37,000 (64.4% advantage for the EPYC 7C13). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	64 / 128+300%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+47%	3.68 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+70%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+753%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	45,784	76,363+67%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+85%	1,538
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	37,000+95%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7C13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7C13 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7C13). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7C13) — the EPYC 7C13 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP3 (EPYC 7C13).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7C13). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7C13 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7C13
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Enterprise Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7C13 debuted at $2000. On MSRP ($409 vs $2000), the Core i7-13700K is $1591 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 38.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7C13 — making the Core i7-13700K the 98.3% better value option.