Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 7F32

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7F32

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

+96.9%

23,253

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,691 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 911.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,691 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 911.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 11.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $2,100 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($2,100 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 7F32?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7F32 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 22.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 96.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $1,691 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it gives you a 22.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 911.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 11.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 7F32 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	284 FPS	193 FPS
medium	268 FPS	158 FPS
high	223 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	167 FPS
medium	200 FPS	135 FPS
high	159 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	69 FPS
medium	134 FPS	58 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7F32

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	689 FPS	433 FPS
medium	580 FPS	379 FPS
high	484 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	367 FPS
medium	525 FPS	332 FPS
high	441 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	229 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	236 FPS
medium	314 FPS	215 FPS
high	295 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	159 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7F32

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	648 FPS	581 FPS
medium	530 FPS	580 FPS
high	467 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	466 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	535 FPS
medium	491 FPS	437 FPS
high	427 FPS	401 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	383 FPS
medium	374 FPS	300 FPS
high	339 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	213 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7F32

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	970 FPS	581 FPS
medium	883 FPS	581 FPS
high	766 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	581 FPS
medium	740 FPS	581 FPS
high	642 FPS	564 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	479 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	519 FPS
medium	515 FPS	468 FPS
high	463 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 7F32

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 7F32

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7F32 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7F32 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 7F32's 23,253 — a 65.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+38%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	45,784+97%	23,253
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F32 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (EPYC 7F32). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7F32 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 7F32
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F32 debuted at $2100. On MSRP ($409 vs $2100), the Core i7-13700K is $1691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 11.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 7F32 — making the Core i7-13700K the 164% better value option.