Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 9565

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 9565

72 Cores144 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

0.0%

135,221

+195.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $10,077 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Delivers 768.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 400W, a 275W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9565 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 135,221).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9565, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

✅+195.3% higher PassMark.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌220% higher power demand at 400W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 9565

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $10,077 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Delivers 768.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $10,486 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 400W, a 275W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9565 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+195.3% higher PassMark.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 135,221).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9565, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($10,486 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌220% higher power demand at 400W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 9565?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9565 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9565 is the better fit. You are getting 195.3% better PassMark, backed by 72 cores and 144 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $10,077 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $10,486 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 9565 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 195.3% better PassMark. It is also 768.1% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9565 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 72 cores / 144 threads instead of 16/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 9565 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
1080p
low	284 FPS	171 FPS
medium	268 FPS	142 FPS
high	223 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	150 FPS
medium	200 FPS	120 FPS
high	159 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	81 FPS
medium	134 FPS	69 FPS
high	103 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9565

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
1080p
low	689 FPS	583 FPS
medium	580 FPS	511 FPS
high	484 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	361 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	492 FPS
medium	525 FPS	439 FPS
high	441 FPS	367 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	302 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	306 FPS
medium	314 FPS	276 FPS
high	295 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	222 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9565

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
1080p
low	648 FPS	747 FPS
medium	530 FPS	634 FPS
high	467 FPS	575 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	561 FPS
medium	491 FPS	474 FPS
high	427 FPS	423 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	366 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	405 FPS
medium	374 FPS	324 FPS
high	339 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	229 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9565

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
1080p
low	970 FPS	969 FPS
medium	883 FPS	875 FPS
high	766 FPS	752 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	676 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	780 FPS
medium	740 FPS	683 FPS
high	642 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	513 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	551 FPS
medium	515 FPS	496 FPS
high	463 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	380 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9565

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 9565

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9565

The EPYC 9565 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 3.15 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 135,221 points. Launch price was $10,486.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9565 offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the EPYC 9565 has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9565 — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.15 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9565 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 9565's 135,221 — a 98.8% lead for the EPYC 9565. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9565.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	72 / 144+350%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+26%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+8%	3.15 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+1180%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	45,784	135,221+195%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9565 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9565). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9565) — the EPYC 9565 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9565).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6 TB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9565). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9565 targets Data Center / Cloud Computing. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 9565 rivals Xeon 6972P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9565
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	—	Data Center / Cloud Computing

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9565 debuted at $10486. On MSRP ($409 vs $10486), the Core i7-13700K is $10077 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 9565 — making the Core i7-13700K the 158.7% better value option.