Core i7-13700K vs EPYC 9655

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 9655

96 Cores192 Thrd400 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024

Popular choices:

••••••••i7-13700K•

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-13700K

16 / 24

45,784

0.0%

156,110

+241.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,443 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 749.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 400W, a 275W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9655 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 29,329).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅+54.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌220% higher power demand at 400W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

EPYC 9655

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $11,443 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Delivers 749.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $11,852 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 400W, a 275W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9655 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+54.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 29,329).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 384 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9655, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($11,852 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌220% higher power demand at 400W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9655 better than Core i7-13700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 9655 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9655 is the better fit. You are getting 54.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 96 cores and 192 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9655 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9655 is 2797.8% more expensive on MSRP at $11,852 MSRP versus $409 MSRP, and it gives you 54.5% better Geekbench multi-core. The trade-off is that Core i7-13700K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700K is also 749.9% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9655 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 1180% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 30 MB), more multi-core headroom with 96 cores / 192 threads instead of 16/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 9655 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	284 FPS	170 FPS
medium	268 FPS	143 FPS
high	223 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	149 FPS
medium	200 FPS	121 FPS
high	159 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	83 FPS
medium	134 FPS	73 FPS
high	103 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	47 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9655

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	689 FPS	696 FPS
medium	580 FPS	602 FPS
high	484 FPS	475 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	411 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	566 FPS
medium	525 FPS	501 FPS
high	441 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	336 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	331 FPS
medium	314 FPS	295 FPS
high	295 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	235 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9655

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	648 FPS	746 FPS
medium	530 FPS	633 FPS
high	467 FPS	589 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	561 FPS
medium	491 FPS	474 FPS
high	427 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	376 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	411 FPS
medium	374 FPS	331 FPS
high	339 FPS	299 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	238 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9655

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
1080p
low	970 FPS	1047 FPS
medium	883 FPS	939 FPS
high	766 FPS	821 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	744 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	839 FPS
medium	740 FPS	733 FPS
high	642 FPS	641 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	562 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	605 FPS
medium	515 FPS	539 FPS
high	463 FPS	477 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	416 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open EPYC 9655

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 9655

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9655

The EPYC 9655 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 400 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 156,110 points. Launch price was $11,852.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 9655 offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the EPYC 9655 has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.5 GHz on the EPYC 9655 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9655 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 9655's 156,110 — a 109.3% lead for the EPYC 9655. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,830, a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 29,329 (42.8% advantage for the EPYC 9655). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 384 MB (total) on the EPYC 9655.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	96 / 192+500%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+20%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	384 MB (total)+1180%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Turin (2024)
PassMark	45,784	156,110+241%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	2,830
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	29,329+55%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9655 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 9 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9655). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9655) — the EPYC 9655 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9655).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	9 TB+4700%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9655 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9655). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9655 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9655 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 9655 rivals Xeon 6979P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	EPYC 9655
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	AMD-V, SEV-SNP
Target Use	—	Data Center

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9655 debuted at $11852. On MSRP ($409 vs $11852), the Core i7-13700K is $11443 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9655 — making the Core i7-13700K the 157.9% better value option.